Skip to main content
Growth HormoneGHRP / ghrelin agonist

Hexarelin

Also known as: Exarelin, Growth Hormone Secretagogue, Examorelin

By the Peptide Dossier Editorial TeamUpdated How we source

Hexarelin is a synthetic GH secretagogue with human endocrine experiments, mixed longer-term outcomes and exploratory cardiac research. A larger acute GH response does not establish muscle, sleep or cardiovascular treatment benefit.

Quick Facts

Class:GHRP / ghrelin agonist
US product context:Not FDA-approved; routine 503A eligibility not described; WADA prohibits use.
Evidence context:Human pharmacology and small exploratory studies; neutral body-composition and reducedstage-4sleep findings constrain wellness claims.

Identity and receptor pathways

Hexarelin, also known as examorelin or exarelin, is a synthetic six-amino-acid methylated relative of GHRP-6. It stimulates the ghrelin/secretagogue receptor and is marketed for recovery/body composition despite never becoming an approved drug.

It also binds CD36 in cardiovascular tissue. Repeated exposure can partially reduce the GH response; that does not establish irreversible receptor burnout or a validated cycling schedule.

Acute hormone comparisons and body composition

One study in healthy men found that hexarelin produced a larger GH rise than GHRH and acted synergistically with it. This was a study-specific hormone response, rather than a clinical outcome or a universal potency ranking. An acute seven-adult IV comparison found similar GH responses to hexarelin and GHRP-2 under its conditions, with prolactin, ACTH and cortisol increases. This does not support universal potency ranking, GH-only selectivity or a standard subcutaneous half-life.

The 16-week study did not find significant changes in total body fat, lean mass or bone density. IGF-I and IGFBP-3 were not significantly changed over 20 weeks. Biological activity is distinct from an established muscle/recovery outcome.

Sources: [2], [6], [4]

Sleep and cardiac findings

In seven young volunteers, repeated evening IV exposure reduced first-half-night stage-4 sleep and overall EEG delta power while raising several hormones. That finding does not support a general deep-sleep benefit.

In 24 men undergoing coronary bypass, acute IV exposure briefly improved ejection fraction, cardiac index and output while also increasing mean arterial pressure. It was not a chronic event-reduction study.

Rat membrane/perfused-heart experiments identified CD36 involvement and increased coronary perfusion pressure, absent in CD36-deficient hearts. A receptor or vasoconstrictive response is not automatically human cardioprotection.

Sources: [1], [3], [5], [7], [8]

Response attenuation and research exposures

The longer study used 1.5 micrograms/kg subcutaneously twice daily. Mean GH-response areas were 19.1, 13.1, 12.3 and 10.5 micrograms/L·hour at baseline and weeks 1, 4 and 16, returning to 19.4 four weeks after treatment. Weeks 4 and 16, but not week 1, were identified as significant decreases in the abstract. A related 12-person report described partial, reversible attenuation; these should not be counted as separate large trials.

Shorter studies maintained GH responses in seven older adults over 8 days intranasally and seven older women over 15 days orally. Oral treatment slightly increased IGF-I/IGFBP-3, with no prolactin/cortisol change or side effects reported. Small short studies cannot establish chronic SC safety.

The sleep experiment used four 50-microgram IV doses; the surgical study used 2 micrograms/kg IV. Those routes and populations do not define a general injection amount, pre-workout/bedtime rule, stack or receptor-reset calendar.

Approval, sport and safety

Hexarelin has no FDA approval and is described as ineligible for routine 503A compounding. It is not approved for performance or anti-aging, and WADA prohibits hexarelin/examorelin at all times.

Acute non-GH hormone responses and the unfavorable sleep finding remain important. No side effects in small short oral/intranasal studies is not proof of rare-event safety, years of use or superiority to GHRP-2/GHRP-6. The marketed clinical benefits remain unproven.

References and further reading

This reference draws on Superpower’s Peptide Library and the research linked below. Peptide Dossier’s editorial team adapted and integrated the material on .

  1. 10.1161/01.res.0000016164.02525.b4Sleep and cardiac findingsCited in: Sleep and cardiac findings
  2. 10.1159/000126827Acute hormone comparisons and body compositionCited in: Acute hormone comparisons and body composition
  3. 10.1016/j.tem.2005.11.004Sleep and cardiac findingsCited in: Sleep and cardiac findings
  4. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov — additional readingAcute hormone comparisons and body compositionCited in: Acute hormone comparisons and body composition
  5. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov — additional readingSleep and cardiac findingsCited in: Sleep and cardiac findings
  6. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov — additional readingAcute hormone comparisons and body compositionCited in: Acute hormone comparisons and body composition
  7. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov — additional readingSleep and cardiac findingsCited in: Sleep and cardiac findings
  8. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov — additional readingSleep and cardiac findingsCited in: Sleep and cardiac findings
  9. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov — additional reading
  10. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov — additional reading

Frequently Asked Questions About Hexarelin

An acute seven-person study found similar GH responses to IV hexarelin and GHRP-2 at the tested doses. It does not support a universal fold-change or potency ranking across routes and populations.

The cited studies do not establish an optimal pre-workout or bedtime self-injection schedule. In the small evening IV study, stage-4 sleep and delta power decreased.

A larger combined hormone response would not establish better clinical outcomes or safety. The reviewed studies do not validate a general hexarelin stack.

The evidence reviewed here does not establish a head-to-head safety advantage. Hormonal effects, participant selection, route and duration matter.

Acute GH responses occur in experiments, but the 16-week study did not demonstrate significant lean-mass, fat or bone-density changes. No universal results timeline follows from those data.

Study-specific hormone timing cannot establish that hexarelin is universally faster or clinically better than other secretagogues. Peptide pharmacokinetics and downstream hormone responses are different measurements.

Related Peptides

Continue exploring Hexarelin

Search all related references →

Our library review is ongoing. Read how we evaluate evidence or report a correction.

Disclaimer: This article is for informational and educational purposes only. It is not intended as medical advice. The information presented is based on published research and should not be used as a substitute for professional medical guidance. Always consult a qualified healthcare provider before starting any peptide protocol. Some peptides discussed may not be approved for human use by the FDA or equivalent regulatory bodies.